In recent years, the issue of “untraceable firearms” has become a topic of controversy as these firearm kits enable individuals to assemble homemade guns. With the involvement of the Supreme Court and the challenges faced by regulations, this issue has gained even more attention.
The Biden administration attempted to regulate untraceable firearms through a 2022 regulation issued by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. This regulation expanded the definition of “firearm” and required manufacturers and sellers to obtain licenses, affix serial numbers, and conduct background checks. However, the enforcement of this regulation has been inconsistent and faced legal challenges.
Untraceable firearms differ from ordinary firearms as they are sold as separate parts and can be assembled by unlicensed individuals. They are often obtained through DIY kits available online. These kits do not require a background check and do not include serial numbers. Assembly is relatively simple and can be done with minimal tools and instructions provided with the kit.
The prevalence of untraceable firearms has been on the rise, especially in states with strict firearm regulations like California. These firearms have been linked to criminal activity, with law enforcement officials reporting their recovery at crime scenes. They have also been connected to mass shootings, although their impact on day-to-day gun violence is of greater concern.
The effectiveness of regulating untraceable firearms through executive actions has been limited. The regulation issued by the Biden administration has faced criticism for its minimal impact on curbing the sale and assembly of these firearms. Critics argue that a legislative statute validated by Congress would be more effective in addressing this issue.
In conclusion, the rise of untraceable firearms and the ongoing debate surrounding them highlight the challenges of regulating homemade guns. The Supreme Court’s involvement and the inconsistencies in enforcement contribute to the ongoing controversy. Immediate action is needed to address the proliferation of these firearms and their impact on public safety.
